THE PROBLEM IS NOT CH Á TIME. THE PROBLEM IS BUENAVENTURA.
writes: César Vásquez Bazán
In the period between 2005 and 2010, the Compania de Minas Buenaventura only paid to the Peruvian from tax on income the sum of $ 117 million. Its profits were twenty-one times over: amounted to 2.401 million dollars.
This is the way wealth is distributed in the country non-renewable with current tax and benefits enjoyed by the Buenaventura.
The distribution of surplus is not even fifty-fifty . No my dear listeners, no. It is fifty-fifty . Buenaventura is 95%. 5% for Peru.
These figures will not find you in the media "communication" of the country, because they share in the loot system we describe.
Fortunately, all financial information you can check it by clicking the links of the sources (presented at the end of this article.)
mining earnings presidential debate
presidential candidates representing the looters of the country would think it appropriate to treat the issue of mining profits in public. For them, discussing how mining companies are rising to the country by weight, since the time of Fujimori, is something "outdated." They say that talking about this great faenón "threatens growth, which should not" look back. " You have to "defend democracy" and should not be affected "market stability."
If you propose to discuss the taboo subject of the profits of mining companies, for example, the ticket that takes Buenaventura - have no doubt you are a communist, Marxist, socialist, APRA years thirty, nationalist, extremist, terrorist, agitator, Chavez, or "anti."
Vargas Llosa came to say that it is even likely that you will get cancer or AIDS and does not notice.
In the presidential debate last Sunday, the Toledo-pure drunken pose as always very Felipillo - spoke of "drawing a line." The candidate with the name of viceroy for a moment imagined English conquistador on the island of Gallo. He drew his sword and drew a line in defense of the interests of the class that takes over-with shell-style and the richness of Peru.
illegal candidate for Kuczynski, illegal alien-even rant about his French mother and his father German. He had no need to touch the issue of mining plunder because it had previously indicated that it should not even think of applying a windfall tax, that it "would drive away capital."
course, did not say that capital is scare them by themselves, each year carried 95% of Peru economic surplus generated.
illegal The other candidate, Keiko Fujimori from Japan, also referred to his dad , but kept silent about the gift of natural resources that the dictator, another usurper of Peruvian president for foreign-made mining companies.
To deliver the riches of Peru, the Japan did adopt a constitution ad-hoc and put into force legislation subsidizing large-scale mining activity with reinvestment of profits that become tax deductions to income.
As birthday cake, Japanese mining Fujimori gave the infamous "tax stability contracts, which are like a sign with the assailant assaulted an agreement by which the victim accepts and appreciates the pillage ten, fifteen, or twenty years in a row.
No my dear, this does not go. You can not go. Here the issue is not Chavez. The issue is Buenaventura Yanacocha, Antamina, Barrick, Southern and others. They are the ones behind the campaign of fear against candidates who dare to raise the issue of mining windfall.
Next April 10 that the right will not follow us dumb. Let's vote against looting. We do not support either candidate of the mining. Kuczynski punish foreigners and Fujimori, wanting us cholitos. not vote for the Felipillo Toledo, agent of foreign interests, not for the dumb Comunicore .
Let's vote for the candidate who offers to halt and reverse the payment of what may be called the New Rescue Atahualpa. Choose the candidate who begins to put justice in the distribution of wealth and dignity back to Peru.
Make click on the following links:
0 comments:
Post a Comment